Getting a discussion regarding disparate treatment of experts which have caregiving commitments, come across Part I B Donaldson v. Are. Banco Corp., Inc., 945 F. Supp. 1456, 1464 (D. Colo. 1996); find plus Piraino v. Int’l Direction Res., Inc., 84 F.3d 270, 274 (seventh Cir. 1996) (rejecting “shocking claim” by the offender you to no pregnancy discrimination shall be revealed where confronted step occurred just after delivery away from plaintiff’s child); Pacourek v. Inland Metal Co., 858 F. Supp. 1393, 1402 (Letter.D. Sick. 1994) (quoting Legislative History of brand new PDA at 124 Cong. Rec. 38574 (1978)) (“[T]he PDA offers a female ‘the best . . . getting financially and you may legitimately secure just before, throughout, and you will immediately after their own maternity.’”). Look for, elizabeth.grams., Neessen v. Arona Corp., 2010 WL 1731652, within *eight (Letter.D. Iowa ) (plaintiff was at PDA’s safe category in which offender allegedly did not get their particular due to the fact, in the course of their unique application, she had also been expecting and you will considering birth).