Sec. 46b-21. (Formerly Sec. 46-1). Matrimony of individuals related by consanguinity or attraction prohibited. Nobody may marry such man or woman’s mother or father, grandparent, youngster, grandchild, aunt, parent’s brother, sibling’s youngster, stepparent otherwise stepchild. Any wedding in these degrees was void.
History: P.An effective. 78-230 altered text slightly and you can substituted “may” to have “shall”; Sec. 46-step one moved to Sec. 46b-21 within the 1979; P.
A good. 09-13 made provision prohibiting a person marrying individual regarding the opposite sex related within this particular amounts of consanguinity or affinity appropriate regardless of sex of these other individual, energetic
Cannot prohibit relationship which have inactive husband’s sister. several C. 94. “Sister” includes 50 % of-sister to have reason for incest prosecution. 132 C. 165. The wedding out of a relative and her uncle inside the Italy, whether or not valid truth be told there and contracted versus intention to avoid the law associated with state, kept perhaps not legitimate within this condition. 148 C. 288. 158 C. 461.
Sec. 46b-twenty two. (Previously Sec. 46-3). Just who may subscribe people in marriage. Penalty to have unauthorized efficiency. (a) People registered to help you solemnize marriages within county were (1) hot Kvareli girl all of the judges and you may resigned evaluator, sometimes elected or designated, and government evaluator and you may judges regarding other states whom can get legally signup people during the ily assistance magistrates, family help referees, condition referees and justices of the tranquility who happen to be designated for the Connecticut, and (3) all the ordained or registered people in the fresh new clergy, owned by this county and other state. Most of the marriage ceremonies solemnized with regards to the versions and you may uses of any religious denomination within this condition, together with marriages experienced by the a duly constituted Religious Assembly of your Baha’is, was valid. All of the marriages tried to getting popular by every other people was void.
(b) No public-official legitimately signed up so you’re able to point relationships permits will get signup people in-marriage lower than power of a permit given by himself, or his assistant otherwise deputy; nor get these assistant or deputy signup persons in-marriage under authority away from a license given from the such as for instance public official.
Ordained deacon performing usual commitments off minister held to be authorized
(1949 Rev., S. 7306; 1951, S. 3001d; 1967, P.A. 129, S. 1; P.An effective. 78-230, S. cuatro, 54; P.A great. 79-37, S. step one, 2; P.A. 87-316, S. 3; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 01-4, S. twenty seven, 58; P.An excellent. 06-196, S. 276; P.An effective. 07-79, S. 5; P.A good. 15-74, S. 1; 15-85, S. cuatro.)
History: 1967 act given validity out of marriages saw because of the Religious Set-up off brand new Baha’is; P.An effective. 78-230 split up point with the Subsecs., removed reference to state and you can reordered and you will rephrased conditions in the Subsec. (a) and replaced “may” getting “shall” inside the Subsec. (b); P.A beneficial. 79-37 subscribed resigned judges and you can county referees to execute marriages; Sec. 46-step 3 relocated to Sec. 46b-twenty-two in 1979; P.A good. 87-316 used terms so you can household members assistance magistrates; ended Subsec. (a) adding supply re government evaluator and you can judges regarding almost every other says who can get legally sign up persons for the ; P.A. 06-196 produced a technical improvement in Subsec. (a), active finished Subsec. (a) to provide Subdiv. designators (1) to help you (3), improve conditions re persons authorized so you can solemnize marriage ceremonies inside the state and then make tech transform; P.An excellent. 15-74 revised Subsec. (a)(3) by the deleting requirement you to people in the clergy keep on works of the ministry; P.A beneficial. 15-85 revised Subsec. (a)(2) adding “relatives service referees”, effective .
Minister who solemnizes relationship should be “paid in the work of the ministry”. 2 R. 382. 4 C. 134. Good clergyman into the starting marriage service was a general public administrator and his acts in this ability prima-facie proof his reputation. Id., 219. Evidence of occasion from wedding raises an expectation of their authenticity. 85 C. 186; 93 C. 47. Inside the lack of proof authority of fairness off peace, relationships void; our legislation cannot admit common-law marriage ceremonies. 129 C. 432. Relationship, lacking getting wanted out of due solemnization, voidable. 163 C. 588.